- Details
- By Professor Victoria Sutton
Guest Opinion. This time of year, poultry gets a lot of attention, particularly turkeys. So I’ve been thinking about how we might do better than industrial farming, which is not only cruel but also creates conditions that make an outbreak of deadly disease inevitable, as demonstrated by recent avian flu outbreaks and the massive culling of birds.
On Industrial Farming of Poultry
There is no question that cramped cages—often called battery cages—where a bird cannot spread its wings for its entire life, or becomes so heavy it must sit down for most of its life, are cruel. You might expect “industrialization” to provide lower costs to customers, but the price of poultry has actually risen since industrial farming began. Since 2016, USDA figures show steady increases.
Are Battery Cages for Poultry Legal in the U.S.?
At the federal level, there is no legislation prohibiting the use of battery cages. As of February 2024, the cage-free flock represented around 40% of the total egg-laying flock in the United States. In the EU, the share is about 61%, and globally around 16%. Many states, however, have passed their own laws to curtail the use of this confinement method—some within just the last few years.
State legislation in ten states since 2008 has either banned battery cages or required a 73% increase in space over the industry standard, effectively eliminating battery cages. By 2026, an estimated 16% of all layers in the U.S. will live without battery cages. The following states have passed legislation to accomplish this:
-
Arizona (sales and production bans)
-
California (sales and production bans)
-
Colorado (sales and production bans)
-
Massachusetts (sales and production bans)
-
Michigan (sales and production bans)
-
Nevada (sales and production bans)
-
Ohio (production ban)
-
Oregon (sales and production bans)
-
Rhode Island (production ban)
-
Utah (production ban)
-
Washington (sales and production bans)
Switzerland was the first country to ban cages for laying hens in 1992. The European Union banned battery cages in 2012, and several other countries, including New Zealand, have adopted similar bans.
Broiler Chickens Suffer Industrial Ambitions
Most “broiler” chickens are selectively bred to produce the most meat in the shortest time using the least amount of feed. Modern broilers reach market weight in only six weeks. Daily growth rates have increased more than 300% in the past 50 years, from about 25 grams per day to 100 grams per day.
These broilers are selected for rapid growth and body mass. By six weeks of age, many are so large they cannot fully support their own weight, causing them to spend up to 90% of their lives lying down. Their organs often cannot sustain their size, causing pain during the final days of their lives.
The USDA issued new regulations in 2023 that establish at least some basic standards for avian species. These include requirements that surfaces be constructed of materials that can be cleaned or sanitized and that contacts with birds must be nontoxic, structurally sound, and free of sharp edges.
Organic poultry standards require more free-range activity and overall better living conditions. But as anyone who has shopped for poultry knows, organic chicken carries a premium—often 35% higher in price—while free-range chicken can be 50% higher.

Why We Should Rethink Industrialization
Prices for poultry have not dropped despite industrialization. Industrial operations are often located in low-income areas and require water-quality permits due to the massive amounts of waste they generate, putting nearby water at risk.
Disease also spreads quickly in industrial poultry operations due to the close proximity of birds. The 2014–15 avian flu outbreak in the U.S. led to 50 million birds being culled. It was less infectious for broilers but highly infectious for laying hens and turkeys, and ultimately affected poultry prices. The 2021–22 outbreak was global and began spreading to mammals such as mink and foxes.
When Animal Diseases Become a Public Health Threat
Culling diseased animals is required under federal, state, and international law. Farmers follow biosafety protocols for reporting outbreaks, collecting dead animals, testing, and culling. Culling may be ordered by state or federal authorities, and typically, when losses result from a legally defined nuisance such as disease, no compensation is paid. However, the federal government does offer compensation for farmers who follow required protocols, and some states compensate livestock owners as well.
Even so, culling must be done humanely. The Humane Methods of Slaughter Act, passed in 1958, does not include poultry, leaving “best commercial practices” as the prevailing guidance. Unfortunately, humane practices are not always followed. A recent incident in British Columbia, where more than 300 ostriches were slaughtered after an avian flu outbreak, sparked international outrage. Despite assurances that “sharpshooters” were used, many birds were found alive the next day, requiring further killing. Advocates argue the method used was among the least humane options available.
Final Thoughts
From industrial farming to inhumane culling, humane treatment of poultry is often absent. Industrialization increases the risk of disease outbreaks in tightly confined spaces, leading to mass culling orders. Even when culling is necessary, such as in cases of avian flu, it should never excuse inhumane killing methods.
Chickens and turkeys have long been important protein sources. In many Native American cultures, it is tradition to thank the animal for giving its life for food. Treating these birds humanely is a reasonable act of reciprocity.
We need to rethink how we can avoid massive kill-offs, acknowledge that industrialization has not reduced costs for consumers, and insist on humane practices for these often overlooked animals. It is time to amend statutes that currently exclude poultry from basic humane-treatment requirements.
We can do better.
To read more articles by Professor Sutton go to: https://profvictoria.substack.
Professor Victoria Sutton (Lumbee) is a law professor on the faculty of Texas Tech University. In 2005, Sutton became a founding member of the National Congress of American Indians, Policy Advisory Board to the NCAI Policy Center, positioning the Native American community to act and lead on policy issues affecting Indigenous communities in the United States.
Help us tell the stories that could save Native languages and food traditions
At a critical moment for Indian Country, Native News Online is embarking on our most ambitious reporting project yet: "Cultivating Culture," a three-year investigation into two forces shaping Native community survival—food sovereignty and language revitalization.
The devastating impact of COVID-19 accelerated the loss of Native elders and with them, irreplaceable cultural knowledge. Yet across tribal communities, innovative leaders are fighting back, reclaiming traditional food systems and breathing new life into Native languages. These aren't just cultural preservation efforts—they're powerful pathways to community health, healing, and resilience.
Our dedicated reporting team will spend three years documenting these stories through on-the-ground reporting in 18 tribal communities, producing over 200 in-depth stories, 18 podcast episodes, and multimedia content that amplifies Indigenous voices. We'll show policymakers, funders, and allies how cultural restoration directly impacts physical and mental wellness while celebrating successful models of sovereignty and self-determination.
This isn't corporate media parachuting into Indian Country for a quick story. This is sustained, relationship-based journalism by Native reporters who understand these communities. It's "Warrior Journalism"—fearless reporting that serves the 5.5 million readers who depend on us for news that mainstream media often ignores.
We need your help right now. While we've secured partial funding, we're still $450,000 short of our three-year budget. Our immediate goal is $25,000 this month to keep this critical work moving forward—funding reporter salaries, travel to remote communities, photography, and the deep reporting these stories deserve.
Every dollar directly supports Indigenous journalists telling Indigenous stories. Whether it's $5 or $50, your contribution ensures these vital narratives of resilience, innovation, and hope don't disappear into silence.
The stakes couldn't be higher. Native languages are being lost at an alarming rate. Food insecurity plagues many tribal communities. But solutions are emerging, and these stories need to be told.
Support independent Native journalism. Fund the stories that matter.
Levi Rickert (Potawatomi), Editor & Publisher