- Details
- By Stephany Seay
Guest Opinion. Gov. Greg Gianforte’s lawsuit against Yellowstone National Park’s bison management plan represents Montana livestock interests — not the vast majority of Montanans, who support restoring wild, migratory buffalo restored in the state.
The brucellosis boogey-man argument — Gianforte’s far-fetched claim wild bison pose a major disease threat to cattle — is old and is full of holes. It also lacks scientific support. The disease arrived in North America through imported cattle and entered the Yellowstone buffalo herds by erroneous human actions. No documented cases exist of wild buffalo transmitting brucellosis to livestock, even prior to the expired Interagency Bison Management Plan. Montana livestock interests oppose quarantine, which, while a domestication process, produces brucellosis-free buffalo. Meanwhile, elk, who have transmitted brucellosis to livestock dozens of times, are free to roam. This issue has never been about brucellosis. It is a centuries-old range war about the grass and who gets to eat it.
Montana actively participated in Yellowstone’s new bison management plan. State officials had every opportunity to submit comments and attend webinars beginning in January 2022. They have met regularly with Yellowstone officials as well as other Interagency Bison Management Plan cohorts. Gianforte’s feedback to Yellowstone during the planning process grossly altered the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), as well as the Final EIS and Record of Decision. Despite public comments favoring Alternative 3 by more than 75%, the park chose Alternative 2. I’d call that input that was caved to.
Roam Free Nation doesn’t care much for the new bison management plan either, but for completely opposite reasons than Gianforte and his livestock cronies.
And why should Gianforte care if the population increases? Nearly every single buffalo who migrates into Montana is gunned down by state and treaty hunters. The Montana Dept. of Livestock has barely lifted a finger in over a decade. Now they have mainly Native American tribes doing their dirty work, using treaties to facilitate the destruction of the last wild buffalo.
The governor’s complaint claims Yellowstone’s buffalo population is too high, contradicting Yellowstone’s senior bison biologist, Chris Geremia, who stated Yellowstone alone can sustain upwards of 11,000 buffalo. Claims that buffalo are “harming” habitat in the park also conflict with research by Yellowstone’s former senior bison biologist, Rick Wallen, who found buffalo don’t use all the available habitat within the park.These animals create and manage their own habitat — which they have done for hundreds of thousands of years. It’s what they do. Wild, migratory buffalo are the true stewards of grasslands and prairies.
The Yellowstone population faces significant conservation challenges. The International Union for the Conservation of Nature lists bison as “near threatened.” Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (MFWP) — shockingly, a plaintiff in the suit — classifies buffalo as a Tier 1 species “ in greatest conservation need.” The Montana Heritage Program and MFWP have listed bison as a species of concern, considered to be at risk. The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service is considering the Yellowstone herds for Endangered Species Act protection.
Wild bison advocates have gotten too soft on Montana’s livestock interests. Given Gianforte’s crybaby actions, it’s time to put them back in the hot seat.
Stephany Seay is the co-founder of the Montana-based and Native-led nonprofit Roam Free Nation.
Help us tell the stories that could save Native languages and food traditions
At a critical moment for Indian Country, Native News Online is embarking on our most ambitious reporting project yet: "Cultivating Culture," a three-year investigation into two forces shaping Native community survival—food sovereignty and language revitalization.
The devastating impact of COVID-19 accelerated the loss of Native elders and with them, irreplaceable cultural knowledge. Yet across tribal communities, innovative leaders are fighting back, reclaiming traditional food systems and breathing new life into Native languages. These aren't just cultural preservation efforts—they're powerful pathways to community health, healing, and resilience.
Our dedicated reporting team will spend three years documenting these stories through on-the-ground reporting in 18 tribal communities, producing over 200 in-depth stories, 18 podcast episodes, and multimedia content that amplifies Indigenous voices. We'll show policymakers, funders, and allies how cultural restoration directly impacts physical and mental wellness while celebrating successful models of sovereignty and self-determination.
This isn't corporate media parachuting into Indian Country for a quick story. This is sustained, relationship-based journalism by Native reporters who understand these communities. It's "Warrior Journalism"—fearless reporting that serves the 5.5 million readers who depend on us for news that mainstream media often ignores.
We need your help right now. While we've secured partial funding, we're still $450,000 short of our three-year budget. Our immediate goal is $25,000 this month to keep this critical work moving forward—funding reporter salaries, travel to remote communities, photography, and the deep reporting these stories deserve.
Every dollar directly supports Indigenous journalists telling Indigenous stories. Whether it's $5 or $50, your contribution ensures these vital narratives of resilience, innovation, and hope don't disappear into silence.
The stakes couldn't be higher. Native languages are being lost at an alarming rate. Food insecurity plagues many tribal communities. But solutions are emerging, and these stories need to be told.
Support independent Native journalism. Fund the stories that matter.
Levi Rickert (Potawatomi), Editor & Publisher