- Details
- By Levi Rickert
Opinion. The federal government's understanding of tribal nations often requires basic education with each new administration. Within Native communities, this process is often referred to as "Indians 101," acknowledging the frequent lack of understanding among non-Natives regarding tribal issues and concerns.
Some presidents arrive with a stronger foundation in tribal affairs than others. For example, Joe Biden’s extensive tenure in Washington gave him a solid grasp of an understanding of tribal sovereignty. His commitment was demonstrated in his selection of Deb Haaland, a citizen of the Laguna Pueblo, as Secretary of the Interior. Upon her confirmation, Haaland made history as the first Native American to serve in a presidential cabinet in a secretarial role.
As Donald Trump began his second term on January 20, one might have assumed that his administration had gained an understanding of the United States' unique government-to-government relationship with tribal nations during his first term. However, since the beginning of the Trump second term on January 20 it appears the new administration appears to be clueless about the status of tribes in the United States.
This status predates the United States government. Prior to 1776, the sovereign governments of England, France, and Spain entered into treaties with sovereign tribal nations on this continent.
Treaties are not symbolic gestures; they are legally binding agreements between sovereign nations. Just as the United States signs treaties with foreign nations, it has entered into 374 treaties with tribal nations, affirming their self-governing status. These agreements are a clear acknowledgment that tribal sovereignty is based on political status, not race.
Before European settlers arrived, tribal nations governed themselves, established trade relationships, formed alliances, and managed complex societies with their own laws and customs. These were, and still are, sovereign nations. The fact that tribal nations maintain this political status today is not a matter of racial classification but rather of legal and historical recognition. The U.S. Constitution itself acknowledges tribal sovereignty, treating Native nations as distinct political entities capable of engaging in government-to-government relations.
For far too long, tribal nations and Native people have been misunderstood by the broader American public. One of the most common misconceptions is the belief that Native American identity is solely racial rather than political. This misunderstanding has serious consequences, influencing everything from Supreme Court decisions to everyday discussions about Indigenous rights. The record must be clear: Tribal nations are political entities, not racial groups.
Despite this legal framework, the misconception that tribal identity is racial rather than political has been used to undermine tribal nations’ rights. A recent example is the Brackeen v. Haaland U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), where opponents argued that ICWA constitutes racial discrimination. Such arguments dangerously ignore the fact that ICWA is based on the political status of tribes, not racial preference. The act was designed to protect Native children and preserve the sovereignty of tribal nations in child welfare cases. By mischaracterizing tribes as racial groups rather than political entities, opponents of ICWA attempted to erode tribal sovereignty.
The consequences of this misunderstanding extend beyond the courts. Tribal sovereignty is often dismissed in public discourse because many people do not grasp that Native American identity is rooted in citizenship within a tribal nation, not racial classification. Unlike racial groups, which are defined by shared ancestry and social categorization, tribal nations determine their own membership based on their laws and traditions. While ancestry may be a factor, it is ultimately political, not racial, criteria that govern tribal citizenship.
Efforts to conflate tribal status with race are not just incorrect; they are harmful. They serve to weaken treaty rights, limit tribal self-determination, and justify policies that erode Indigenous sovereignty. The attack on Native political identity is a direct attack on the inherent rights of tribal nations to govern themselves.
The solution is education and advocacy. Americans must understand that tribal nations exist as distinct political entities with legal rights, responsibilities, and sovereignty. The U.S. government has a trust obligation to tribal nations precisely because they are sovereign governments, not because of any racial classification. Recognizing this distinction is not only a matter of legal accuracy but also a step toward honoring the commitments made to Indigenous peoples.
Tribal sovereignty is not a relic of the past—it is a living, legal, and political reality. It is time for the United States to respect and uphold this truth, ensuring that tribal nations are recognized for what they truly are: self-governing, sovereign entities that exist not because of race, but because of the enduring power of Indigenous political identity.
Thayék gde nwéndëmen - We are all related.
More Stories Like This
For Native Communities, Medicaid Is a Promise Washington Must Keep“One Beautiful Bill” Would Be a Tragic Setback for Indian Country
Federal Courts Left (Not) to Protect Sacred Sites
Joining the Call to Save Job Corps
As Antiquities Act Turns 119, Tribal Nations Face New Threats on Sacred Sites
Help us tell the stories that could save Native languages and food traditions
At a critical moment for Indian Country, Native News Online is embarking on our most ambitious reporting project yet: "Cultivating Culture," a three-year investigation into two forces shaping Native community survival—food sovereignty and language revitalization.
The devastating impact of COVID-19 accelerated the loss of Native elders and with them, irreplaceable cultural knowledge. Yet across tribal communities, innovative leaders are fighting back, reclaiming traditional food systems and breathing new life into Native languages. These aren't just cultural preservation efforts—they're powerful pathways to community health, healing, and resilience.
Our dedicated reporting team will spend three years documenting these stories through on-the-ground reporting in 18 tribal communities, producing over 200 in-depth stories, 18 podcast episodes, and multimedia content that amplifies Indigenous voices. We'll show policymakers, funders, and allies how cultural restoration directly impacts physical and mental wellness while celebrating successful models of sovereignty and self-determination.
This isn't corporate media parachuting into Indian Country for a quick story. This is sustained, relationship-based journalism by Native reporters who understand these communities. It's "Warrior Journalism"—fearless reporting that serves the 5.5 million readers who depend on us for news that mainstream media often ignores.
We need your help right now. While we've secured partial funding, we're still $450,000 short of our three-year budget. Our immediate goal is $25,000 this month to keep this critical work moving forward—funding reporter salaries, travel to remote communities, photography, and the deep reporting these stories deserve.
Every dollar directly supports Indigenous journalists telling Indigenous stories. Whether it's $5 or $50, your contribution ensures these vital narratives of resilience, innovation, and hope don't disappear into silence.
The stakes couldn't be higher. Native languages are being lost at an alarming rate. Food insecurity plagues many tribal communities. But solutions are emerging, and these stories need to be told.
Support independent Native journalism. Fund the stories that matter.
Levi Rickert (Potawatomi), Editor & Publisher
